Passenger is not available for windows. However, it seems for a simple
deployment configuration, under windows, I can just simply put the
virtual hosts section into http.conf, e.g.:
Passenger is not available for windows. However, it seems for a simple
deployment configuration, under windows, I can just simply put the
virtual hosts section into http.conf, e.g.:
and away I go. Am I wrong? Isn't this about the simplest and easiest
means of deployment? -Janna
Yes, you can do this -- it's more or less what everyone did before
Passenger came along; Passenger just automates it. However, you'll want
multiple Mongrel processes if you're doing anything remotely close to
production use, and at that point Windows is no longer an appropriate
choice for other reasons anyway (such as security). I think you'd be
better advised to deploy on *nix of some sort (perhaps in a VM?), so the
point is kind of moot.
No way -- have you tried to make a war file with warbler? I am an ex
Java programmer -- and the JRuby java-style of deployment defeats the
purpose of why we all went to Ruby!
It's ALL NONSENSE. I do NOT want to "war" things up. Been there --
done that, left it behind. Things should be able to run out of a
filesystem, without modification, without all kinds of steps.
Otherwise, we're going backwards, Jruby notwithstanding. -Janna
There is no warring here. The gem is about 3.4 MB in size and directly run Rails or Rack based frameworks (Merb, Sinatra, Ramaze) by hooking up HTTP (grizzly framework) with the framework of your choice.
Have you tried this on a system with Sun Application Server on it? I
get:
G:\jruby\rails_apps\myapp>glassfish
G:\jruby\rails_apps\myapp>asadmin start-domain domain1.
Starting Domain domain1., please wait.
Log redirected to G:\Sun\SDK\domains\domain1.\logs\server.log.
Redirecting output to G:/Sun/SDK/domains/domain1/logs/server.log
Domain domain1. is ready to receive client requests. Additional
services are bei
ng started in background.
Domain [domain1.] is running [Sun Java System Application Server
9.1_02 (build b
04-fcs)] with its configuration and logs at: [G:\Sun\SDK\domains].
Admin Console is available at [http://localhost:4848].
Use the same port [4848] for "asadmin" commands.
User web applications are available at these URLs:
[http://localhost:8080https://localhost:8181 ].
Following web-contexts are available:
[/web1 /__wstx-services ggripv2 ].
Standard JMX Clients (like JConsole) can connect to JMXServiceURL:
[service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://XP1:8686/jmxrmi] for domain management
purposes.
Domain listens on at least following ports for connections:
[8080 8181 4848 3700 3820 3920 8686 ].
Domain does not support application server clusters and other
standalone instanc
es.
This is cool. No repackaging -- and if I am correct, when running in
glassfish (on Windows systems, jruby -S glassfish ) I am running in a
true J2EE application server every bit as powerful as, say JBoss?
The Http connector (which is the really important part) is the same
Grizzly NIO connector that goes inside the full fledged Glassfish, but
this is a lite version with most of the Java EE garbage striped out.
You wouldn't need it anyway in a Rails application, no reason to keep
it.
So, in effect, it is more like running under tomcat, without having to
make a war file and all that java-nonsense -- and since I am running
in JRuby, I get the full power of that.
And you call it just like you'd call a mongrel server. Easiest way to
get up and running with Ruby on Windows if you don't want to struggle
with native gems and natural Ruby slowness on Windows.
Vivek, it’s all working and the Glassfish gem is very nice indeed:
JRuby 1.3.0RC2
Glassfish Gem 0.9.5
Rails 2.3.2
I say this because I was able to configure glassfish gem with only 2 JRuby runtimes and I was able to serve 1681.10 pages per sec. BTW, I configured ab as follows: