New RJS naming convention

I've renamed my .rhtml files to .html.erb and everything works fine.

Renaming .rjs to .js.rjs; however, does not. Pages don't render unless
I specifically tell them to using render :template.

Any thoughts? Is the .js.rjs naming convention not quite ready yet?

Thanks,

Norman

Yes, js.rjs works just fine in Rails 2.0.2.

You must be missing something. I did a simple useless test to just
hide a div using RJS. Here how it looks:

routes.rb:
  map.resources :offers, :collection => { :hide => :get }

offers_controller:
  def hide
    respond_to do |format|
      format.js
    end
  end

hide.js.rjs:
  page.hide "hide_me"

index.html.erb:
<p><%= link_to_remote "Hide Me", :url => { :action => 'hide' } %></p>
<div id="hide_me">
  Some stuff to hide
</div>

application.html.erb:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
  <title>Hello World</title>
  <%= javascript_include_tag :defaults %>
</head>
<body>
<%= yield %>
</body>
</html>

Yes, you need the "respond_to do |format|" specified in your
controller. Prior to 2.0, rjs files worked without this. Now they
don't, as far as I can tell.

-Kyle