Rails coding/design input

Frederick_Cheung · May 22, 2009, 8:16am

I think you'd be better off with a named_scope (or possibly with_scope).

Fred

Colin_Law1 · May 22, 2009, 8:24am

Possibly use default_scope?

Topic		Replies	Views
[ActiveRecord] Bang version of named scopes rubyonrails-core	0	164	May 30, 2013
default named_scope rubyonrails-talk	1	112	August 21, 2008
named_scopes - any reason why you should not alway use a named scope (c.f. a custom method to return limited results) rubyonrails-talk	4	73	January 22, 2009
eager loading a named_scope rubyonrails-talk	0	132	July 20, 2008
How to use Find with conditions? rubyonrails-talk	0	203	July 12, 2009