Performance comparison: LiteSpeed + Ruby LSAPI vs Ruby FCGI

Hi,

I spent some time on benchmarking Ruby LSAPI and Ruby FCGI interface, it
might be helpful for people who want to bring the best performance out
of Ruby/Rails, if you if you are interested, the result is available at
http://blog.litespeedtech.com/

Best Regards,
George Wang

Btw, any chance on getting a binary compiled for Freebsd 6?

Hi George,

Can you tell me if LSAPI natively supports something like this

http://sean.treadway.info/demo/upload/

Thanks,
Serge

snacktime,

We built freebsd 6 binary periodically, you can get it at
   
http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.2/std/lsws-2.2-std-i386-freebsd6.tar.gz
or
    
http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.2/ent/lsws-2.2-ent-i386-freebsd6.tar.gz

Best Regards,
George

Serge,

No, upload progress bar does not work with LSWS+LSAPI, it is not
related to LSAPI, but because LSWS
waits for the whole request before forwarding it to backend scripting
engine. We does that because the precious backend scripting engine
don’t need to wait for the slow I/O.

On the other hand, doing upload progress bar inside Rails framework is
not a good idea to us, maybe OK for small sites, but for high traffic
sites, scalability will become a serious issue.

Best Regards,

George

wrote:

Thanks!!