I've been looking around, and I can't seem to find anything definitive
on whether or not you can coax Routes into omitting the collection name
when doing a nested resource; i.e.
map.resource :users do |users|
users.resources :pages # some other option here
Is this functionality actually there? If not, *should* it be? The
use-case scenario I'm thinking of is having users add pages to their
/users/1 # user 1 view, which presumably lists the pages the user has
/users/1/research # user 1's research page
/users/1/fun # user 1's fun page
I'm not really sure how this conform with the Rails philosophy...