The best plan would be to get the server updated if possible.
Colin
The best plan would be to get the server updated if possible.
Colin
Another options is to put rails 2.3.2 into the app structure itself:
On the development machine
rake rails:freeze:gems
This puts unpacks the gems which comprise rails ( activerecord, activesupport, actionpack etc) under the vendor/rails
Assuming that deployment is via a repository (svn, git...) commit the application making sure that vendor/rails is placed under version control.
Then it doesn't matter what the current 'official' rails version is on the server, it will use the same version you use in development.
This is a bonus both ways, you can use a later version than the one installed as gems on the server, and you are isolated if the 'it guys' update the rails gems without telling you, something which can easily break your app.
Rick Denatale wrote:
Freezing unpacks the gems into vendor/rails. Unfreezing is a simple as blowing away that directory (there's probably a rake task that does that too)
Fred
Rick Denatale wrote: > rake rails:freeze:gems
A possibly stupid question, but why do I get a .gem directory in my home directory when I do freeze? Well I get the idea, but why not keep the .gem in the app root or somewhere? What happens with my other apps running, they will use the .gem too, right?
.gem isn't used for frozen stuff. It's something gem does in some cases when ran as a user that can't write to the system wide gem location.
Fred
Yep, one of my peeves with gem is that it does this. I always want gems to be installed in the system location, if I forget to sudo gem I don't want it to be installed in my home directory.
I finally removed all permisions from my ~/.gem directory so if I forget, it let's me know rather than giving me a useless install.
chmod 000 ~/.gem