Hi,
Let's say we have users concurrently performing the following queries inside a transaction (example taken directly from PostgreSQL site):
User A:
Hi,
Let's say we have users concurrently performing the following queries inside a transaction (example taken directly from PostgreSQL site):
User A:
Alexei, I believe this is the same message you posted two days ago. Did you see the replies?
In short: both databases do what you expect. Use a single update statement to avoid issues with concurrency, locking, and dirty reads.
Best, jeremy
Alexei, I believe this is the same message you posted two days ago. Did you see the replies?
Yes, I've seen the replies - I have no idea, why the same message got posted once again, days later
Thank you very much for your help!
Alexei