Adam4
(Adam)
April 22, 2008, 6:18am
1
Hi all,
I just wanted some feedback on a AR hack I have been playing with
which implements the block syntax for create and update method.
For example, instead of:
@person = Person.new(params[:person])
@person.has_rails_patch = false
@person.set_status :uncool
@person.save
You could do:
@person = Person.create(params[:person]) do |p|
p.has_rails_patch = false
p.set_status(:uncool)
end
And the update version
@person = Person.update(params[:id], params[:person]) do |p|
p.set_status(:cool)
end
It makes it more Rubyish with the blocks, don't you think? The bang!
versions could added easily enough, for create anyway.
Let me know what you think before I put a patch in.
Thanks,
Adam.
bitsweat
(Jeremy Daer)
April 22, 2008, 6:29am
2
I like it. Note that new takes a block, so you can already
@person = Person.new(params[:person]) do |p|
p.has_rails_patch = false
p.set_status :halfway
end.save!
if you like.
Best,
jeremy
[snip]
You could do:
@person = Person.create(params[:person]) do |p|
p.has_rails_patch = false
p.set_status(:uncool)
end
I like this a lot. I always thought create should work that way.
K
Sounds like it should be! Go for the patch!
regards,
Jan
Adam4
(Adam)
April 22, 2008, 7:54pm
5
Thanks all. I will patch and let you know the link for the +1's!
Adam
Adam4
(Adam)
April 22, 2008, 8:59pm
6
Actually there is another thing I wanted canvas.
With create and update you have the option to pass in an array to save
multiple records. Using the block syntax you could call the block on
each record in the array.
Person.create([{:name => 'Adam'}, {:name => 'Jeremy'}]) do |p|
p.set_status(:cool)
end
It could be powerful but is it intuitive or should they be mutually
exclusive?
Adam.
Ian_White
(Ian White)
April 22, 2008, 9:39pm
7
Person.create([{:name => 'Adam'}, {:name => 'Jeremy'}]) do |p|
p.set_status(:cool)
end
['Adam', 'Jeremy'].each do |name|
Person.create do |p|
p.name = name
p.set_status(:cool)
end
end
is not that different, and just uses a common ruby idiom
Cheers,
Ian
Adam4
(Adam)
April 22, 2008, 9:47pm
8
Effectively the same, but because the array variants of create and
update already exist it is a matter whether to pass the block to each
record in the array. It doesn't have to but I was wondering if it
would cause confusion. But on thinking it through I think it makes
sense to me.
Adam
Adam4
(Adam)
April 22, 2008, 10:33pm
9
Patch is in. Please check it out and see if you like enough some +1's.
http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/39-add-blocks-to-ar-create-and-update
It will add this goodness:
people = [{:name => 'Jeremy'}, {:name => 'Ken'}, {:name => 'Jan'},
{:name => 'Ian'}]
Person.create(people) do |p|
p.set_status :cool
p.thanked = true
end
Cheers,
Adam