hi,
just added this to my routes:
map.namespace :admin do |admin| admin.resources :categories end
to have a /admin/… urls.
but now all of my other links do have that prefix!? why is that? any ideas?
thx
hi,
just added this to my routes:
map.namespace :admin do |admin| admin.resources :categories end
to have a /admin/… urls.
but now all of my other links do have that prefix!? why is that? any ideas?
thx
You just added categories to your admin resource. That said, you'll end up with routes looking like this /admin/id/resource.
What that means is that any time you need to call a resource, you'll have to include the admin id in it as they as "nested".
You could have a look at this railscast
Luis
thx luis,
i know what u are describing. what i didnt know and dont know how to “undo” is:
being on a regular resource, eg index-view of projects, all urls show fine, eg :3000/tasks, 3000/milestones, …
but being on the admin/categories resource and i hover over the “link_to projects” and all the others, it shows me /admin/projects. i didnt specify that, so im just wondering …
thx
Can you post your link_to code?
If you have something like link_to projects_path
it shouldn't pick the the route from admin
thats exaclty why im gettin confused. here are two link from the application.rhtml:
<%= link_to “Invite Friends”, :controller=>‘tellyourfriends’, :action=>‘new’ if logged_in? %> <%= link_to_unless_current ‘Browse Categories’, :controller=>‘categories’, :action=>‘index’
here the routes: map.namespace :admin do |admin| admin.resources :categories end map.resources :categories
is there somethign wrong here?
thx for ur time! i appreciate it
tom
You're defining categories as a single resource and nested resource. That's why you're getting the conflicting results.
Which one of the two links are is displaying the nested url? I assume the second one
Luis
well,
i was following a tutorial regarding admin namespaces. i do have a model holding categories. goeal would be to have a user-ui to have just 3000/categories and an admin-ui for editing etc. not sure now how to proceed. i would like to keep the admin views in a separate folder plus admin-controller.
do u have a pointer?
thx
im not sure if you need a nested resource for what you want to accomplish. Just go ahead and define admin and categories as a single resource.
Luis
Looking at the documentation more closely, you could do something like this in your routes
namespace "admin" do resources :categories end
This will give you /admin/categories in the way you want.
Luis
yes, was looking at the same, but that is rails3 if im not wrong.
ill keep digging
thx
doing just: map.namespace :admin do |admin|
admin.resources :categories, :controller=>"categories"
end
gives me two routes: /admin/categories /categories
both are hitting the right controllers, but once im on the admin-index-view, all other links are still prefixed with admin. o well
type rake routes to figure out all the new routes
Tom Tom wrote in post #956151:
doing just: map.namespace :admin do |admin|
admin.resources :categories, :controller=>"categories" end
gives me two routes: /admin/categories /categories
both are hitting the right controllers, but once im on the admin-index-view, all other links are still prefixed with admin. o well
You may need to use :controller => '/whatever' instead of :controller => 'whatever' in your link_to to force things into the root namespace.
Best,
I find it weird that it's doing that. If you use the correct restful path, it should hit the right url
But you can try what Marnen suggested, seem hacky though..
Luis Saffie wrote in post #956383:
I find it weird that it's doing that. If you use the correct restful path, it should hit the right url
Oh, yeah, named routes shouldn't be affected.
But you can try what Marnen suggested, seem hacky though..
I wouldn't call it hacky. Rails link_to, presumably by design, assumes the current namespace unless otherwise specified.
Best,
Luis Saffie wrote in post #956383:
I find it weird that it’s doing that. If you use the correct restful
path, it should hit the right url
Oh, yeah, named routes shouldn’t be affected.
But you can try what Marnen suggested, seem hacky though…
I wouldn’t call it hacky. Rails link_to, presumably by design, assumes
the current namespace unless otherwise specified.
i ddint know that. good to know. is there a way of setting this dynamically? thx tom