I'm using the postgresql adapter with ActiveRecord. When I execute
this script, I get an error about the id sequence not existing even
though i created the table without the id.
ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version => 0) do
create_table :articles, :id => false do |t|
t.column :title, :string
end
end
art = Article.create( :title => "Green Eggs and Ham" )
Executing this script gives this error:
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:120:in
`log': RuntimeError: ERROR C42P01 Mrelation "articles_id_seq" does
not exist Fnamespace.c L200 RRangeVarGetRelid: SELECT
currval('articles_id_seq') (ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid)
Since I created the table with ":is => false", there is no
articles_id_seq and so AR should not be looking for one. Am I missing
something or is this a bug?
Even though what I posted to you works there may be a problem with ActiveRecord, by supplying the "primary_key" option it should have created a primary key in the database table for you, but the PostgreSQL adapter does not do this. It just creates an indexed and sequenced column.
It does for me... at least with rails 1.1.6, postgres 8.1.5, and the postgres 0.7.1 gem...
I just checked one of my tables and it reports a primary key...
otf_dev=> \d photos;
Table "public.photos"
Column | Type | Modifiers
Even though what I posted to you works there may be a problem with
ActiveRecord, by supplying the "primary_key" option it should have
created a primary key in the database table for you, but the PostgreSQL
adapter does not do this. It just creates an indexed and sequenced
column.
It does for me... at least with rails 1.1.6, postgres 8.1.5, and the
postgres 0.7.1 gem...
I just checked one of my tables and it reports a primary key...
You have a "default" id generated primary key column. I am talking in
reference to the OPs scenarios, where you have a different field then
"id" be the primary key.
I agree it does work when using the default "id" primary key field.
Ah... I'd missed that part of the thread... I thought I'd read somewhere that if you specify your own primary key you're on your own as far as setting up the sequence/next id stuff regardless of DB since Rails assumed if you're doing that you had a good reason... but I coudl be wrong. And not sure it's even relavant to what you two were talking about