Two years experience seems a particularly difficult requirement since
Rails 1.0 was only released about 14 months ago.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rails/34705
Even those of us who were learning Rails before 1.0 might not have two
full years experience.
Do you take post-dated resumes ? 
Hi Greg,
Greg Donald wrote:
Were looking for :- Two years experience - Ruby on rails
Do you take post-dated resumes ? 
LOL!!!
But... I like it when companies make postings like that. Makes it real easy to sort out who might be worth working for.
Best regards,
Bill
Rails did have a long 0.x period. I started playing with Rails around
0.7, released in late 2004, and was employed as a Rails developer for
0.9.x, released January 2005. There was a bit of a community, even
then. Two years experience is about the maximum, but it's not exactly
unheard of.
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=307 for gem release dates.
-Kyle
Kyle Maxwell wrote:
Rails did have a long 0.x period. I started playing with Rails around
0.7, released in late 2004, and was employed as a Rails developer for
0.9.x, released January 2005. There was a bit of a community, even
then. Two years experience is about the maximum, but it's not exactly
unheard of.
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=307 for gem release dates.
-Kyle
Ditto. I started using it full time once I read the Rolling on Rails article at onlamp
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/01/20/rails.html
Luckily I made the decision for which technologies I used 
That was January 2005
- Chris